SAMEER JAIN
Sanjay Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Hon'ble Sameer Jain, J.
1. Heard Sri Vijay Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Nikhil Srivastava, learned counsel for the informant and Dr. S.B.Maurya, learned AGA-I, for the State.
2. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in F.I.R./Case Crime No.260 of 2023, under Sections 420, 406,467,468, 471, 507 and 120B IPC, Police Station Indirapuram, District Ghaziabad with the prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail during trial.
3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press the instant anticipatory bail application on merit and a direction may be given to the court concerned that if applicant appears before it and applies for bail then his bail application shall be disposed of in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022) 10 SCC 51.
4. Learned counsel for the informant as well as learned AGA are not having any objection if any such direction is given to the court concerned.
5. I have heard both the parties and perused the record of the case.
6. Considering the submissions advanced by lea
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.