IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
DEEPAK VERMA, J.
Rakesh @ Rakesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondents
Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. - 2858 of 2024
Decided on : 01-02-2024
Bail - Section 376(2) N, 506 I.P.C. - Applicant granted bail based on consensual relationship and lack of evidence
Fact of the Case:
The applicant filed a bail application in a case involving allegations of Section 376(2) N and 506 I.P.C. The victim and the applicant had a consensual relationship, and the victim later married someone else, leading to the filing of the first information report.
Finding of the Court:
The court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, granted bail to the applicant based on the consensual nature of the relationship, lack of evidence, and the prolonged incarceration of the applicant.
Issues: The main issue was whether the applicant should be granted bail in a case involving serious charges of sexual assault and criminal intimidation.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the consensual nature of the relationship, lack of evidence, and the prolonged incarceration of the applicant as grounds for granting bail.
Final Decision: The bail application was allowed, and the applicant was ordered to be released on bail with specific conditions.
JUDGMENT :
Deepak Verma, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
2. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No.280 of 2023, under Section 376(2) N, 506 I.P.C. P.S. Fatehganj West, District Bareilly, during pendency of the trial.
3. As per FIR allegation, marriage between applicant and victim was settled by both families, thereafter, applicant and victim developed physical relationship and after sometime, marriage was not materialized. The victim married to some other person thereafter first information report was lodged.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. From the statement of victim recorded under Sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C. it appears that victim was in consensual relationship with applicant. From the statement of husband and other witnesses, it appears that there is no video or audio evidence as alleged in the F.I.R.. The Investigating Officer has also not recorded any electronic evidence. The applicant has no criminal antecedent. Moreover, there is no prospect of trial of the present case being concluded in near future. The applicant is languishing in jail since 26.11.2023 and in case, he is enlarged on bail he will not misuse the liberty of bail and co-operate in trial.
5. Learned A.G.A. opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.
6. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
7. Let the applicant, Rakesh @ Rakesh Kumar, who is involved in the aforesaid case crime, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.
(ii) The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
(iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
8. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
The consensual nature of a relationship and the lack of evidence can be considered as grounds for granting bail in cases involving serious charges.
The presumption of innocence is fundamental; bail is a rule and imprisonment an exception, requiring substantial grounds for denial.
Consent and permanent residency can be considered as grounds for granting bail in cases of abduction and rape.
Point of Law : 8. Complainant has willingly been staying with the appellant and had the relationship. Therefore, now if the relationship is not working out, the same cannot be a ground for lodging an....
The court held that the nature of allegations and the relationship must be carefully scrutinized at the bail stage, with particular attention to the concept of consent in cases involving alleged fals....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.