IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, ACJ.
M/s Neelkanth Construction – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India And Others - Respondent
Arbitration And Concili. Appl.U/S11(4) No. - 42 of 2023
Decided on : 19-01-2024
Arbitration - Appointment of Arbitrator - Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 11(6) - Clauses 63 & 64 - The court discussed the relevant provisions of the General Conditions of Contract 2014, Indian Railways, including Clause 64.(3) regulating the appointment of Arbitrator and Clause 63 regarding matters finally determined by the Railway.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an Arbitrator in relation to disputes arising from a contract with Indian Railways. The opposite parties contended that the contract was determined under Clause 61.1 and the matter was not referable to Arbitrator.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the main dispute was whether the claim of the applicant was arbitrable or fell under the 'excepted matter' as notice under Clause 61 was given or waived. The court held that the issue of arbitrability required appreciation of evidence and should be left to be decided by the arbitrator.
Issues: The main issues were whether the claim was arbitrable, whether the notice under Clause 61 was waived, and whether the applicant followed the prescribed procedure for invoking the arbitration clause.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the limited power of the court to decide non-arbitrability, the requirement for a vestige of doubt that the claim is non-arbitrable, and the refusal of the opposite parties to refer the dispute to the arbitrator.
Final Decision: The court allowed the application and proposed the name of a retired Judge as the Arbitrator, with provisions for obtaining consent and appointing an alternate arbitrator if necessary.
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Chandra Shekhar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Abhijeet Saxena, Advocate holding brief of Sri Awadhesh Kumar Saxena, for the opposite parties.
2. The instant application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') has been filed by the applicant for appointment of an Arbitrator in terms of Clauses 63 & of the General Conditions of Contract 2014, Indian Railways, in respect of disputes and differences arising out of the contract dated 07.08.2017.
3. The letter of acceptance dated 03.04.2017, accepting the proposal of the applicant stipulated that General Conditions of Contract 2014 and Indian Railways Unified Standard Specification (materials and works) (Vol. I & II) 2010 Rules, up to date special conditions attached shall apply to the contract.
4. It is not in dispute between the parties that Clause 64.(3) regulates the appointment of Arbitrator and the same is extracted below: -
64.(3)(a)(i): In cases where the total value of all claims in question added together does not exceed Rs.25,00,000/- (Rupees twenty five 25,00,000/- (Rupees twenty five lakh only), the Arbitral Tribunal shall consist of a Sole Arbitrator who shall be a Gazetted Officer of Railway not below JA Grade, nominated by the General Manager. The sole arbitrator shall be appointed within 60 days from the day when a written and valid demand for arbitration is received by GM.
64.(3)(a)(ii): In cases not covered by the Clause 64(3)(a)(i), the Arbitral Tribunal shall consist of a panel of three Gazetted Railway Officers not below JA Grade or 2 Railway Gazetted Officers not below JA Grade and a retired Railway Officer, retired not below the rank of SAG Officer, as the arbitrators. For this purpose, the Railway will send a panel of more than three names of Gazetted Railway Officers of one or more departments of the Railway which may also include the name(s) of retired Railway Officer(s) empanelled to work as Railway Arbitrator to the Contractor within 60 days from the day when a written and valid demand for arbitration is received by the GM.
Contractor will be asked to suggest to General Manager at least 2 names out of the panel for appointment as Contractor's nominee within 30 days from the date of dispatch of the request by Railway. The General Manager shall appoint at least one out of them as the Contractor's nominee and will, also simultaneously appoint the balance number of arbitrators either from the panel or from outside the panel, duly indicating the 'presiding arbitrator' from amongst the 3 arbitrators so appointed. GM shall complete this exercise of appointing the Arbitral Tribunal within 30 days from the receipt of the names of Contractor's nominees. While nominating the arbitrators, it will be necessary to ensure that one of them is from the Accounts Department. An officer of Selection Grade of the Accounts Department shall be considered of equal status to the officers in SA Grade of other departments of the Railway for the purpose of appointment of arbitrator.
5. Clause 63, which is also relevant, is as follows:-
The court emphasized the limited power of the court to decide non-arbitrability and the requirement for a vestige of doubt that the claim is non-arbitrable before referring the dispute to the arbitra....
2020 Rules which came into force from the date of their publication in the Official Gazette, i.e. 12.02.2020, cannot be given retrospective effect. The intention of Government of India to make the 20....
Scope of judicial review by court while deciding an application under Sections 8 or 11 of Arbitration Act, post amendments by Act 3 of 2016 (with retrospective effect from 23-10-2015) and even post a....
The court affirmed that the claimant must secure the necessary Airport Entry Permits and upheld the arbitration award, ruling no breach by the respondent; consent regarding the arbitrator's appointme....
The court established that the modified provisions of the General and Special Conditions of Contract (GCC) regarding the constitution of the Arbitral Tribunal were applicable in railway contracts, an....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to appoint a sole arbitrator based on the arbitration clause in the contract and the respondent's failure to send a panel of ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.