CHANDRA KUMAR RAI
Mumtaj Ali – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. Chandra Prakash Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Shashwat Kishore Chaturvedi, learned counsel for respondent no.5 and Mr. Abhishek Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Mr. Deepak Gaur, learned counsel for respondent-Gram Sabha.
2. Petitioner has filed the instant petition in public interest stating that petitioner has no personal and private interest in the present matter and the result of the present litigation will not lead any undue gain to the petitioner and anyone associated with him, hence present public interest litigation be entertained.
3. Petitioner has pleaded in the petition that plot no.678 area 1.2060 hectare situated in Village-Bamauan, Tahsil-Tahrauli, District-Jhansi is reserved for public-abadi in revenue record. He further pleaded that plot no.678 is road side plot and valuable property of gaon sabha so few person of the locality including petitioner moved an application before Additional District Magistrate (Administration), Jhansi for construction of Community Health Centre over plot no.678 as the same is adjacent to road and tahsil campus accordingly, a letter was sent to Sub-Divisi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.