JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned counsel for the opposite party No.3, Sri Kamal Krishna, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Gaurav Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party No.4 to 6 and learned AGA for the State.

2. This criminal revision has been preferred against order dated 08.09.2022, passed by the learned Additional Session Judge/F.T.C.-I, Ballia in Session Trial No. 224 of 2008 (State vs. Vinay Singh), Case Crime No.64 of 2006, under Section 302 IPC, police station Haldi, district Ballia, whereby the application filed by the revisionist / accused under Section 319 CrPC, has been rejected.

3. Perusal of record shows that the informant of the case, namely, Radhey Shyam Mishra has lodged the first information report of this case on 5/6.12.2006 at 00:30 hours, alleging that on 05.12.2006 his son Manoj Mishra has gone to see his uncle Brijesh Chaubey at Babuvela. There Manoj along with his uncle Brijesh Chaube was attending a ‘Tilak’ ceremony organised by Ashok Kumar Singh. During that function while programme of dance was going on, Dr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Vaibhav Singh s/o Dr Ashok Kumar Singh, Dr. Abhishek Singh and Dr. Vinod both s/