UMESH CHANDRA SHARMA
Priti Pandya – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
UMESH CHANDRA SHARMA, J.
1. Heard Sri Dheeraj Singh (Bohra), learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.
2. The applicant-accused in Criminal Complaint under Section 138 N.I. Act has preferred this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the order dated 22.10.2021, passed by Sri Vijay Kumar Agrawal, Presiding Officer of Additional Court No. 03, Gautam Budh Nagar, by which he allowed the complainant’s application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. and permitted the production of three documents on record and summoned the Post Office’s Clerk and Advocate Sri Braj Bhushan Pal for deposition.
3. In brief, facts of the case are that M/s. Tanya Buildcon (India), Private Limited, has filed a complaint under Sections 138 & 141 N.I. Act, against M/s. Gujrat Isotop Pvt. Ltd. and its Director/M.D. Miss. Priti Pandya before the C.J.M. Gautam Budh Nagar, bearing No. 16712 of 2010, which was contested by the opposite parties.
4. In this complaint case, evidence were recorded and documents were already produced by the complainant. Relevant parts of the order-sheets of the lower court has been produced by the applicant, which di
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.