Sunil Kumar Yadav VS State of U. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

SIDDHARTH
Sunil Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Rajiv Lochan Shukla, Anil Kumar Verma, Arya Suman Pandey, Brajesh Kumar Singh, G.S. Chauhan, Imran Ullah, Mohammad Khalid, Rajendra Kumar Yadav
For the Respondent: Gaurav Kakkar

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Imran Ullah, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Gaurav Kakkar, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Sunil Kumar Yadav, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 82 of 2020, under Sections 376, 506 I.P.C., Section ¾ of Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and Section 67(B) of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, Police Station-Churkhi, District-Jalaun, during pendency of trial.

3. The applicant has been implicated in this case on the allegation of committing the offence of rape against a woman under 16 years of age, hatching of criminal conspiracy, threatening, committing the offence of penetrative sexual assault and offence u/s 67B of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, along with three co-accused persons also named in the first information report.

4. The allegation in the first information report is that about five years ago when the prosecutrix was studying in Class-X, co-accused, Rashmi and Pinki, called her to their house where she met their brother, the applicant. She was given sweets on the eve of Ho

Click Here to Read the rest of this document