IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
Smt. Sudha - Appellant
Versus
Union Of India And Others – Respondents
Appeal Under Section 37 Of Arbitration And Conciliation Act 1996 No.271 of 2022
Decided on : 19-03-2024
Arbitration and Conciliation Act - Appeal against Order - Failure to ascertain date of receipt of signed copy of arbitral award
Fact of the Case:
The appellant filed an appeal against an order passed by the learned District Judge, Rampur under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, claiming that the appeal was filed within the prescribed period as the signed copy of the arbitral award was never received.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the learned District Judge failed to ascertain the date of receipt of the signed copy of the arbitral award, which was crucial in determining the period of limitation for filing the appeal.
Issues: The main issue was the failure of the learned District Judge to determine the date of receipt of the signed copy of the arbitral award and its impact on the period of limitation for filing the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the law established by the Supreme Court in the case of Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited vs. Navigant Technologies Private Limited, which held that the period of limitation for challenging an award under Section 34 of the Act commences from the date on which the party making the application has received a signed copy of the arbitral award.
Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, the order dated August 8, 2022 was quashed and set aside, and the matter was remanded to the learned District Judge with a direction to examine the records and ascertain the date of receipt of the signed copy of the arbitral award and thereafter pass a reasoned order.
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
2. This is an appeal filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) against an order passed by the learned District Judge, Rampur dated August 8, 2022.
3. Counsel on behalf of the appellant submits that the appeal before the learned District Judge, Rampur was filed within the period prescribed under Section 34(3) of the Act as only the certified copy of the arbitral award was received by the appellant on August 6, 2022 and signed copy of the arbitral award was never received by the appellant. Counsel further submits that the appeal against the said award was filed before the learned District Judge on August 6, 2022, and therefore, there was no delay in filing of the said appeal.
4. Per contra, counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that the appeal was filed after about a year of passing of the award, and accordingly, since Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act is not applicable to Section 34 of the Act, the learned District Judge has acted properly.
5. Upon perusal of the order passed under Section 34 of the Act, it appears that the learned District Judge has only recorded the submission of the appellant that the signed copy of the arbitral award was never received by her. However, there does not appear to be any finding as to when the signed copy of the award was served upon the appellant.
6. In my view, the learned District Judge should have inquired and found out the date of receipt of the signed copy of the arbitral award. In absence of having done so, the learned District Judge has failed to appreciate the law established by the Supreme Court in the case of Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited vs. Navigant Technologies Private Limited reported in (2021) 7 SCC 657 wherein it has been specifically held that the period of limitation for challenging an award under Section 34 of the Act commences from the date on which the party making the application has received a signed copy of the arbitral award. Relevant paragraphs of the said judgment are delineated below:-
35.1. The period of 30 days for filing an application under Section 33 for correction and interpretation of the award, or additional award may be filed.
35.2. The arbitral proceedings would terminate as provided by Section 32(1) of the Act.
35.3. The period of limitation for filing objections to the award under Section 34 commences.
36. Section 34 provides recourse for judicial scrutiny of the award by a court, upon making an application under subsections (2) and (3) for setting aside the award. The period of limitation for filing the objections to the award under Section 34 commences from the date on which the party making the application has “received” a signed copy of the arbitral award, as required by Section 31(5) of the 1996 Act. Section 34(3) provides a specific time-limit of three months from the date of “receipt” of the award, and a further period of thirty days, if the court is satisfied that the party was prevented by sufficient cause from making the application within the said period, but not thereafter.”
7. In view of the fact that the learned District Judge has not recorded any finding with regard to date of receipt of the signed copy of the arbitral award, I am of the view that the matter is required to be remanded to the learned District Judge for taking a fresh decision.
8. In light of the above, the appeal is allowed. The order dated August 8, 2022 is quashed and set aside and the matter is remanded to the learned District Judge with a direction to examine the records and ascertain the date of receipt of the signed copy of the arbitral award and thereafter pass a reasoned order.
The crucial date of receipt of the signed arbitral award determines the period of limitation for challenging an award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
The period of limitation for filing an application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 commences from the date of receipt of a signed copy of the Arbitral Award by the appl....
The limitation period for challenging an arbitral award under Section 34(3) commences upon actual receipt of the signed award, supported by documented evidence of signature on the date of the award.
The calculation of the limitation period under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, requires the exclusion of the first day and the reckoning of the three-month period from the d....
Statutory limitations under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration Act are strict; applications for setting aside arbitral awards cannot be entertained if filed beyond the designated timeframe.
The limitation period for challenging an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, commences only from the date the aggrieved party receives a signed copy of the aw....
The presumption of service of a registered post under the Indian Evidence Act and General Clauses Act is crucial in determining the limitation period for filing objections to an arbitration award.
Arbitral Award – Limitation – S. 34(3) specifically states that an application for setting aside may not be made after three months have lapsed from date of which party making an application had rece....
The limitation period for filing an application under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act commences upon receipt of a signed copy of the arbitral award, not an uncertified copy.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.