JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Abhinav Srivastava, the learned counsel for the revisionist, Sri Anurag Verma, the learned A.G.A.-I appearing on behalf of the State and perused the records.

2. By means of the instant revision filed under Section 102 of Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 the revisionist has made following prayers :

“Wherefore it is prayed that the present Criminal Revision may kindly be allowed and the impugned order dated 07.07.2023 a Criminal Appeal 29/2023 Ram Pratap (Changed Name) vs. State of U.P. by the Learned Court of Additional District Judge/Special Judge (POCSO) Ayodhya, in so far as it relates to the present revisionist may kindly be set-aside.

It is further prayed that during the pendency of this Criminal Revision before this Hon’ble Court, the proceedings of the case in the court below may kindly be stayed.

It is further prayed that any other relief which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case may also kindly be granted to the revisionists.”

3. The impugned order dated 07.07.2023 is an order passed by the Presiding Officer, Children’s Court, Faizabad/Ayodhya dismissing the appeal filed by the juvenile-delinquent against an order dated 19.04