HEMANT GUPTA, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
Manoj @ Monu @ Vishal Chaudhary – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
HEMANT GUPTA, J.
1. The challenge in the present appeal is to an order passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh dated 30.07.2019, whereby an order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehabad declaring the present appellant as juvenile in conflict with law was set aside and the appellant was ordered to stand trial as an adult.
2. The facts relevant for the determination of the present appeal are that the appellant was arrayed as an accused in respect of an occurrence on 18.01.2011, wherein the allegation against the appellant was that he waylaid a car and snatched Rs. 22 lacs from the occupants of the car. The complainant was one of the occupant of the car, whereas, another occupant -Bhim Singh lost his life on account of bullet fired on him. During the pendency of the trial, the appellant moved an application on 07.10.2014 claiming that he was a juvenile as on the date of the incident, relying upon his school record disclosing his date of birth as 13.05.1993. The learned Additional Sessions Judge accepted the plea of the appellant and declared him to be juvenile vide order dated 09.01.2015. Such order was challenged before the High Court b
Jyoti Prakash Rai v. State of Bihar
Abuzar Hossain v. State of West Bengal
Parag Bhati v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Babloo Pasi v. State of Jharkhand and Anr.
Ramdeo Chauhan v. State of Assam
Abdul Hakeem Pardhan and Others v. State of U.P.
Ram Murti Devi v. State of U.P. and Others
Pramod Kumar Manglik v. Smt. Sadhana Rani
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.