SANJAY KUMAR SINGH
Arunendra Alias Daddu Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The instant Criminal Revision under Section 379/401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, hereinafter referred as "Cr.P.C" has been preferred by the revisionist-Arunendra alias Daddu Yadav with a prayer to set aside the impugned order dated 31.10.2023 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge MP/MLA Court, Prayagraj in Complaint Case No. 2390 of 2010 (UPAD01-007721-2010), under Sections 307/419, 436/149, 323/149 I.P.C., Police Station Jhunsi, District Prayagraj, whereby application No. 171 kha dated 17.10.2023 moved by the complainant under Section 319 Cr.P.C. was allowed and revisionist-Arunendra alias Daddu Yadav was summoned to face the trial for the offence punishable under Sections 307/419, 436/149, and 323/149 I.P.C.
2. Heard Mr. V.P. Srivastava, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Nipun Singh, learned counsel for the revisionist, Mr. J.K. Upadhyay, learned Additional Government Advocate assisted by Ms. Pratiksha Rai, learned Brief Holder for the State of U.P./opposite party No. 1, Mr. Kunjesh Kumar Dubey, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and perused the materials on record.
3. Brief facts of the case which are required to be stated are as
Brijendra Singh and others Vs. State of Rajasthan
Hardeep Singh Versus State of Punjab
Mani Pushpak Joshi vs. State of Uttrakhand and another
Periyasami and others Vs. S. Nallasamy
Shiv Prakash Mishra vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Sugreev Kumar vs. State of Punjab and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.