SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 483

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Alok Mathur, J.
Shailendra Pratap Singh – Petitioner
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home, Lko. And Others – Respondents
WRIT - C No. - 2856 of 2024
Decided On : 22-03-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Dev Mani Mishra
For the Respondent: Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary, Vijay Vikram Singh

IMPORTANT POINT
Citizens with valid arms licenses and no written order to deposit arms shall not be compelled to do so solely based on the ensuing Assembly Elections.

Headnote:

Firearms - Compulsory Deposit - The court issued a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the State Government not to compel citizens with valid firearms licenses to deposit their firearms solely based on the ensuing Assembly Elections. The court also directed that no District Magistrate or Officer subordinate to them shall compel citizens to deposit their firearms unless there is an order of the Central Government. However, competent officers are not precluded from passing orders/prohibiting orders in individual cases or in general under the provisions of the Arms Act or the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 after application of mind. The court clarified that District Magistrates are directed to pass orders after examining individual cases for suspending licenses and ensuring the deposit of arms in cases related to persons with criminal history or who are on bail or lacked clean antecedents, as this might interfere with the conduct of free and fair elections.

Fact of the Case:

The court disposed of the petition in terms of a previous order and directed that citizens with valid arms licenses and no written order to deposit arms shall not be compelled to do so.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending, considering the order of the respondents issued under the direction of the Election Commission of India and observations made in previous judgments.

Issues: The issue was whether citizens with valid arms licenses should be compelled to deposit their firearms solely based on the ensuing Assembly Elections.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the previous order and the direction of the Election Commission of India, concluding that citizens with valid arms licenses and no written order to deposit arms shall not be compelled to do so.

Final Decision: The writ petition was finally disposed of with the direction that citizens with valid arms licenses and no written order to deposit arms shall not be compelled to do so, but the opposite parties are open to proceed in accordance with the law on a case-to-case basis if they feel that the continuance of the firearms with the petitioner shall be detrimental to public peace or law and order.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the respondents.

2. Learned counsel for the parties agree that similar controversy as raised in the present petition has been disposed off by this court in terms of the order dated 30.03.2019 passed in Writ Petition Misc. Single No.8774 of 2019 (Ziaur Rahman Alvi vs State of U.P. and others) on the following terms :

"In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the writ petitions are being disposed of with the direction:-

i. A writ in the nature of mandamus is issued commanding the State Government that the citizens who have valid fire arms license including the petitioners, may not be compelled to deposit their fire arms in general merely on the basis of the ensuing Assembly Elections.

ii. It is also commanded that no District Magistrate or District Superintendent of Police or any Officer subordinate to them shall compel the citizens in general to deposit their firearm unless there is an order of the Central Government as indicated hereinabvoe in the judgment.

However, the above directions shall not preclude the competent officer/authority to pass orders/prohibit orders in individual cases or in general under the provisions of the Arms Act or under the provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 after application of mind.

It will also not preclude the District Magistrates/SSPs/S.P.s/Incharge of the Districts to seize weapons and take action against the holders of fire arms licence under the provisions of the Arms Act in case any attempt is made by any citizen to display or carry firearms at any time till the end of the elections as the orders have already been passed by the District Magistrate under Section 144 Cr.P.C.

It is further clarified that in case any citizen has criminal antecedents or found displaying the arms, action may be taken against them in accordance with the provisions of law. District Magistrates are also directed to pass orders after examining the individual cases for suspending the licences and ensuring the deposit of arms in cases related to persons who have criminal history or who are on bail or lacked clean antecendents as the same might involved interference in the conduct of the free and fair elections."

(11) Considering the order of the respondents issued under the direction of the Election Commission of India and observation made in the above referred judgments, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose will be served in keeping the writ petition pending.

(12) Thus, on the reasons recorded in the aforesaid judgments, this writ petition is finally disposed of with the direction that in case the petitioner possess valid arms license for his fire arms and no written order has been issued by the competent authority against him with the direction to deposit the arms, the petitioner will not be compelled to deposit his fire arms.

(13) However, it shall be open for the opposite parties to proceed in accordance with law on case to case basis, in case, if they feel that continuance of the fire arms with the petitioner shall be detrimental to public peace or law and order."

3. Thus, the present petition is also disposed off in terms of the order above extracted and on the same terms and conditions.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top