SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1754

ABDUL MOIN
Ravi Shankar Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Chandra Bhanu Singh.
For the Respondent: C.S.C., Vijay Vikram Singh.

JUDGMENT

Abdul Moin, J.

Heard Shri. Chandra Bhanu Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the respondents no. 1, 3 & 4 and Shri. Vijay Vikram Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2.

2. There is consensus at the Bar that the matter in issue is squarely covered by judgement of this Court dated 16.12.2022 passed in Writ C No. 9064 of 2022 in re: Ram Rang Jaiswal v. State of U.P. and others.

3. For the sake of convenience, the order dated 16.12.2022 passed in the case of Ram Rang Jaiswal (supra) is reproduced below:

    "Heard Sri. Ajey Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the respondents.

    Learned counsel for the parties agree that similar controversy as raised in the present petition has been disposed off by this court in terms of the order dated 30.03.2019 passed in Writ Petition Misc. Single No.8774 of 2019 (Ziaur Rahman Alvi v. State of U.P. and others) on the following terms :

    "In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the writ petitions are being disposed of with the direction:-

    i. A writ in the nature of mandamus is issued commanding the State Government that the citizens who have v

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top