SUBHASH VIDYARTHI
Seema Devi – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Shri Ambika Prasad Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Abhishek Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the State.
2. By means of this instant revision filed under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C. the revisionist has challenged the validity of the order dated 21.12.2023 passed by the Special Judge, POCSO Act/Additional District and Session Judge, Lucknow in Criminal Misc. Case No.1268 of 2023 whereby an application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. filed by the revisionist has been rejected. In the application under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C., the revisionist had alleged that younger brother of opposite party No.6 was having a love affair with a girl. However, marriage of that girl was settled with some other person, due to which the younger brother of opposite party No.6 had committed suicide in the month of June’ 2023. An FIR was lodged in this regard on 01.07.2023 against the complainant’s son Anil Kumar Kanojia. On 03.07.2023, the opposite party Nos.6, 7 & 8 entered the revisionist’s house at about 04:30 PM, her 15 years old daughter was alone in the house, the aforesaid persons started searching for the revisionist’s son Anil Kumar Kanojia and when her daughter object
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.