MANOJ BAJAJ
Anjali – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Applicant- Anjali has filed this petition under Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing of Complaint No.02 of 2023, titled Ruksana Vs. Jasveer and others, under Sections 376D, 120B, 504, 506 I.P.C. and u/s 66 Information Technology Act, 2000, as well as impugned summoning order dated 14.02.2023 passed by Special Judge (POCSO Act), Mathura.
2. Briefly, the facts leading to the application are that the complainant, namely, Ruksana w/o Amajad Khan brought a criminal complaint bearing number 02 of 2023, titled Ruksana Vs. Jasveer and others, before the Special Court (POCSO Act), Mathura with the allegations that she is working as maid in Flat No.223, Krishna Kaishan, Omex Triniti, Police Station- Vrindavan, District- Mathura, where her 11 years old daughter is also residing. On 03rd January, 2023, at around 7.00 p.m., Jasveer s/o Rajendra, r/o House No.170, Post- Firozpur, Police Station- Khurza Nagar, District Bulandshahr, along with Lalit s/o Harghyan Singh, r/o Badshahpur, Siroli, Police Station Loni, District Ghaziabad, Harish Kumar s/o Daljeet Singh, r/o House No.32 Part 2, M.B. Road, Shadulljav, New Delhi and Anjali, w/o Jitendra, r/o Bahadurpur, Police S
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.