SURENDRA SINGH I
Matapher – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Sri Praveen Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri Pankaj Dwivedi, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2.
2. By means of this criminal revision, the revisionist has challenged the impugned order dated 10.12.2019 passed by learned Additional Principal Judge, IIIrd, Family Court, Allahabad in Maintenance Case No. 506 of 2015, Smt. Durga Devi Vs. Matapher filed u/s 125 Cr.P.C. and impugned judgement and order dated 07.12.2022 passed by learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court-2, Allahabad in Misc. Case No. 02 of 2020 (Matapher Vs. Durga Devi) instituted u/s 127 Cr.P.C.
3. By the impugned judgement and order dated 10.12.2019, the Additional Principal Judge, IIIrd, Family Court, Allahabad had allowed the application filed u/s 125 Cr.P.C. and granted maintenance of Rs.7,000/-per month to opposite party no. 2, Smt. Durga Devi.
4. By the impugned judgement and order dated 07.12.2022, the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court-2, Allahabad, had rejected application u/s 127 Cr.P.C. filed by the revisionist, Matapher.
5. Averment has been made by learned counsel for the revisionist that in the trial court, arguments were made on behalf of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.