SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 536

SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY
Ranjeet Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Seemant Singh, Anil Kumar Pal, Sudeep Dwivedi, Manoj Kumar Singh, Vinod Kumar Rai, Ashutosh Kumar Tiwari, Ram Chandra Yadav, Seemant Singh, Prabhakar Awasthi, Kailash Nath Singh, Rohit Pandey, Yashwant Pratap Singh, P.K. Singh, Namit Srivastava, Parvez Alam, Sandeep Kumar Keshari, Randhir Jain, Taniya Pandey, Kamal Singh, Anay Kumar Srivastava, Manjesh Singh Yadav, Priyavrat Tripathi, Prabhakar Tripathi, Hanuman Prasad Kushwaha, Deepak Kumar Jaiswal, Anil Kumar Pandey, Ajay Kumar Rai, Binod Kumar Mishra, Anoop Kumar, Prabhat Kumar Singh, Lalta Prasad, Kartikeya Shukla, Mahesh Prasad Pandey, Umesh Kumar Dubey, Piyush Pandey, Babu Ram Yadav, Arun Yadav, Anurag Agrahari, Mahima Sahai, Pranesh Kumar Mishra, Raj Bahadur Verma, Byas Kumar Prasad, Rajesh Kumar Patel, Sanjeev Kumar Yadav, D.K. Ojha, Raj Kumar, Hariom Mishra, Sandeep Singh, Chandra Bhushan Yadav, Virendra Singh, Shashi Kumar Dwivedi, Subhas Kumar, Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Ramesh Kumar Shukla, Deo Dayal, Nand Lal Yadav, Lalit Ojha, Hanuman Kinkar, Shivendera Rajwar, Gautam Baghel, Uttam Singh, Ashish Agrawal, Vinod Kumar Pandey, Rajeev Mishra.
For the Respondents: C.S.C., Ajay Mishra, Shri Krishna Mishra, Siddharth Khare, Jay Ram Pandey, Sanjay Kumar Singh, Ram Bilas Yadav, Hanuman Kinkar, Archana Singh.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Seemant Singh, learned Advocate, S/Sri Sudeep Dwivedi, Sanjeev Kumar Yadav, Gautam Baghel, Shivendra Rajwal, Rohit Pandey and Ms. Taniya Pandey, learned Advocates for petitioners and S/Sri Ashok Khare, Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Siddharth Khare for applicants in application for impleadment and Ms. Archana Singh, learned Advocates for respondent- Basic Education Board and L.M. Singh, Ravi Prakash Srivastava, Ms. Shruti Malviya, learned Standing Counsel for State.

2. The petitioners before this Court in above referred bunch of writ petitions have participated in recruitment process on posts of Assistant Teachers commenced in pursuance of Government Order dated 19.02.2021.

3. It is the case of all petitioners that they have participated in the examination held on 17.02.2021 and result thereof was declared on 15.11.2021, wherein all petitioners have qualified.

4. It is further case of petitioners that on basis of certain Government Orders, the Regulatory Authority published a new fresh/amended result on 06.09.2022 after earlier result was cancelled. All the petitioners were not found in fresh/subsequent select list and their result status was shown as “Invalid

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top