SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 573

ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL
Brijpal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Chandra Bhusan Kushwaha, Jagdev Singh
For the Opposite Party : G.A.

Judgement Key Points

Key Points: - The Act does not provide punishment for breach of trust; breach of trust can be prosecuted under Section 406 IPC. (!) - Forgery can be prosecuted under either the UP Co-operative Societies Act, 1965 or the IPC; double jeopardy bars punishment under both for the same offence. (!) (!) (!) - An employee/officer of a cooperative society can be prosecuted under the IPC for offences like forgery and breach of trust, even if those offences are also punishable under the Act; discretion at charge framing is allowed. (!) (!) (!) - Section 26 General Clauses Act allows prosecution under two acts but not punishment twice; however, breach of trust (not covered by Act) can be charged under IPC without being barred by Section 26. (!) (!) - The court directs expeditious disposal of the pending proceedings and clarifies jurisdiction over cooperative society fraud cases. (!) (!) (!)

What is the correct approach to prosecuting acts of forgery and breach of trust involving cooperative society employees under the UP Co-operative Societies Act, 1965 and the IPC?

What is the impact of Section 26 GC Act, Section 300 Cr.P.C., and Section 71 IPC on prosecuting an employee for offences under both the Act and the IPC?

What is the court’s stance on whether breach of trust can be prosecuted under IPC(406) when the UP Co-operative Societies Act, 1965 does not provide a penalty for breach of trust?


JUDGMENT :

Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal, J.

1. Heard Sri Jagdev Singh, Advocate assisted by Sri Sheetla Prasad Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri K.B. Srivastava, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and Sri Rajeev Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. By way of the present application, the applicant has challenged the criminal proceeding of Case No.13001 of 2018 (State Vs. Brijpal Singh & Others), pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.18, Etah arising out of Case crime No.125 of 2008, u/s 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, Police Station-Naya Gaon, District-Etah, and also the charge sheet No. 3, dated 24.05.2011 as well as the cognizance order dated 21.07.2011.

3. Facts giving rise to the present case are that the applicant was working as Secretary Sadhan Sehkari Samiti Ltd. Navar Block, Aliganj, Etah. On receiving specific complaints against the applicant, District Assistant Registrar Co-operative Society, Etah, vide order dated 30.11.2007, directed to conduct an enquiry against the applicant. In pursuance of the order dated 30.11.2007 of District Assistant Registrar Cooperative Society, Etah, the enquiry was conducted by a committee consi

              Click Here to Read the rest of this document
              1
              2
              3
              4
              5
              6
              7
              8
              9
              10
              11
              SupremeToday Portrait Ad
              supreme today icon
              logo-black

              An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

              Please visit our Training & Support
              Center or Contact Us for assistance

              qr

              Scan Me!

              India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

              For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

              whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
              whatsapp-icon Back to top