SUBHASH VIDYARTHI
Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Balrampur Rakesh Kumar Jaiswal – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Mohd. Ali, the learned counsel appearing for the applicants and Sri Anant Pratap Singh, the learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
2. By means of the instant application filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the applicants have challenged the validity of the order dated 10.05.2022 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Balrampur in Complaint No. 678 of 2021, whereby the Magistrate has taken cognizance of offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC on the basis of a complaint filed by the opposite party no. 2. The applicant has also challenged the validity of the judgment and order dated 25.01.2024 passed by the Sessions Judge, Balrampur dismissing Criminal Revision No. 67 of 2022 filed against the aforesaid order dated 10.05.2022 and affirming the order.
3. The opposite party no. 2 filed an application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. alleging that his father had died on 04.10.2012 and he had applied for mutation of his name in the record of Nagar Palika Parishad, Balrampur and had deposited house-tax and water-tax on 22.01.2015 and he had also deposited Rs. 500/- towards mutation charges. He had submitted all the relevant documents to the Nagar Palika Parish
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.