ILESH J. VORA
DILIPKUMAR DANABHAI RATHOD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned APP waives service of Rule for the respondent State and Mr.Gohil, learned counsel waives service of Rule for the respondent No.2.
2. With consent of learned counsel for the respective parties and considering the issue involved in the petition, present petition is taken up for final disposal.
3. By way of this petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners seek to challenge the legality and validity of the impugned order dated 21.08.2021 passed in Criminal Revision Application No.243/2021 by learned 11th Sessions Judge, Surat as well as the impugned order dated 04.08.2021 passed in Criminal Misc. ApplicationNo.672/2021 below Exh:1 by learned 10th Additional Chief-Judicial Magistrate, Surat, whereby, the private complaint filed by respondent No.2 for the offence punishable under the provisions of Indian Penal Code, referred to Assistant Commissioner of Police, Surat, for investigation under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (‘the Code’ for short).
4. Question of law sought to be raised in this petition is as to whether an order directing investigation under Section 156(3) can be passed in rel
L.Narayanswamy Vs. State of Karnataka & Ors. (2016) 9 SCC 598
Suresh Kumar Gupta Vs. State of Gujarat
Baijnath Gupta Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
D. Devraja Vs. Owais Sabbir Hussain
Sambhoo Nath Mishra Vs. State of U.P. (1997) 5 SCC 326
Parkash Singh Badal Vs. State of Punjab (2007) 1 SCC 1
Rajib Ranjan Vs. R. Vijay Kumar (2015) 1 SCC 513
P.K.Pradhan Vs. State of Sikkim represented by Central Bureau of Investigation (2001) 6 SCC 704
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.