ALOK MATHUR
Neelam Devi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh Prin. Secy. Panchayat Raj Civil Sectt. Lko – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR
1. Heard Sri Rakesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and the Standing counsel for the respondents.
2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is an elected Pradhan of Gram Panchayat Fatehpur Sangat, Block and Tehsil Jaisinghpur, District Sultanpur being elected in 2021 and was discharging her duties of the said post. Certain complaints were made with regard to her discharge of duties and working and conduct as Pradhan. It was alleged that despite the public money being allocated the work of re-boring of the hand pump and also the work of interlocking and supply of Hume Pipes was not got done as per the prescribed specifications and there were allegations of defalcation of State funds and consequently preliminary inquiry was conducted against the petitioner by District Panchayati Raj Officer, District Sultanpur. In the said inquiry the allegations were found to be substantiated and accordingly in exercise of the powers under Section 95 (1) (g) of Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Rules, 1947 the financial and administrative powers of the petitioner were seized by means of the order dated 4.11.2023.
3. T
Montreal Street Railway Co. v. Normandin
Dattatraya Moreshwar Pangarkar v. State of Bombay
Hari Vishnu Kamath v. Syed Ahmad Ishaque
Remington Rand of India Ltd. v. Workmen [Remington Rand of India Ltd. v. Workmen
T.V. Usman v. Food Inspector, Tellicherry Municipality
Nasiruddin v. Sita Ram Agarwal
Shiveshwar Prasad Sinha v. District Magistrate
Garbari Union Coop. Agricultural Credit Society Ltd. v. Swapan Kumar Jana
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.