RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Harish Singh Aithani – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ravindra Maithani, J.
The challenge in this petition is made to an office order dated 28.04.2023, passed by the respondent no.1 the State of Uttarakhand (“the State Government”) by which, the petitioner has been removed from the post of Member, Jila Panchayat, Bageshwar under Section 138 Uttarakhand Panchayati Raj Act, 2016 (“the Act”) and the petitioner has further been disqualified for being chosen a member of the Panchayat and being elected a Panchayat/Pradhan/Up-Pradhan/ Pramukh/Up-Pramukh/Chairman/Vice-Chairman for a period of five years. The petitioner also challenges the enquiry proceedings including inquiry report dated 18.10.2018 submitted by the respondent no.3 the Commissioner Kumaon Mandal (“the Commissioner”); the petitioner also seeks restoration of his status as Member of Jila Panchayat forthwith.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3. The petitioner was Chairman, Jila Panchayat, Bageshwar (“the Chairman”) from the year 2014 to 2019.
4. The facts, briefly stated, are as follows:-
State of Punjab Vs. Davinder Pal Singh Bhullar
Orient Paper Mills Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board Vs. Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd
State of A.P. Vs. N. Radhakishan
Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta Division Vs. National Tobacco Co. of India Ltd.
Grindlays Bank Ltd. Vs. The Central Government Industrial Tribunal and others
Ajit Kumar Nag Vs. General Manager (PJ) Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd. Haldia and others
Ravi Yashwant Bhoir Vs. Collector
Gulam Mustafa v. State of Maharashtra
Kailash Nath Agarwal and Ors. V. Pradeshiya Indust. & Inv. Corporation of U.P. and Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.