Back
SAURABH LAVANIA
Complainant Of Case Crime 1479/2017 – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Secrt. Lko. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for quashing order. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. factual background of abduction and rape. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. trial court’s decision on dna testing support. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. legal principles surrounding dna testing. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. criteria for admissibility and reliability of dna evidence. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. court's previous rulings on dna evidence. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 7. dna testing ordered for paternity determination. (Para 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 8. emphasis on discovering the truth in legal proceedings. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 9. final dismissal of application with direction. (Para 35) |
JUDGMENT :
Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State of Uttar Pradesh and Sri Manoj Kumar Singh, Advocate, who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No. 2 in the Court today, which is taken on record.
2. By means of this application, the applicant has sought the following main relief:-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
