JUDGMENT :

(Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania, J.) :

1. Heard Shri Gurudutt Pandey, learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State as well as Shri Shashi Kant Mishra, learned counsel appearing for opposite party No.2 and perused the record.

2. The applicants, namely, Ravendra Shukla and Kumari Mamta, have approached this Court seeking following main reliefs:-

"(a) To allow the petition and quash the impugned Charge sheet No. 221 of 2021 dated 09-06-2021 in Case Crime no. 0037/2021 under Section 419, 420, 504 and 506 I.P.C, Police Station Cantt, District Ayodhya along with Cognizance Order dated 03-02-2022 passed by the learned ACJM-I, Faizabad bearing Case No. 258 of 2022, annexed here with as Annexure Nos. 9 and 10 respectively and set aside the Revision Order.

(b) To quash the entire proceeding of Criminal Case No. 258 of 2022: State of Uttar Pradesh vs Mamta and others arises out of Crime No. 0037/2021 under Section 419. 420, 504, and 506 1.P.C. registered at Police Station Cantt, Ayodhya.

(c) To stay the operation and implementation of the proceeding pending before the learned Trial Court A.C.J.M-I of District, Ayodhya, registered as Case No: 258 of 2022: State of Uttar Pr