SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2682

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
Kirti Nath Tiwari - Applicant
Versus
Directorate of Enforcement Govt. of India, Assi. Dir. (PMLA) Somnath Choudhary Allahabad - Opposite Party
APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 482 NO. 4585 OF 2023.
Decided On : 03-07-2023

Advocates appeared:
For the Applicant : Satya Prakash Mishra, Satya Prakash Tiwari.
For the Opposite Party : Kuldeep Srivastava.

Headnote:(A) Criminal Procedure Code - Section 482 - Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 120-B, 409, 420 - Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 - Section 3 - Application under Section 482 challenging summoning order dismissed as lack of merit - Applicant's failure to appear and cooperate with the trial court noted - Prior complaint of embezzlement led to charge-sheet against applicant and co-accused. (Paras 3, 6, 26)

(B) Inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of CrPC is to be exercised sparingly and to prevent abuse of process, not to determine sufficiency of evidence which should be left for trial. (Paras 10, 12, 18)

Facts of the case:
The applicant challenged a summoning order alleging he assisted a co-accused in embezzling bank funds, with no valid health reasons given for avoiding trial. (Paras 6-8)

Findings of Court:
The court observed that the summoning order did not violate any legal norms and there was sufficient ground for proceeding with charges against the applicant. (Paras 26)

Issues: The primary issue was whether the applicant's actions constituted sufficient grounds for a criminal charge and if the prosecution was an abuse of process. (Paras 13, 27)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that no abuse of process was present, and the applicant's conduct indicated an attempt to evade legal proceedings, warranting the summoning order. (Paras 27)

Result: Application rejected.

Table of Content
1. valid summons and trial initiation (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. non-cooperation affects discretionary relief (Para 6 , 7)
3. credibility of evidence in the application (Para 8 , 9)
4. judicial discretion regarding quashing proceedings (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
5. inherent powers should not be arbitrarily exercised (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
6. definition of guilt in money laundering (Para 23 , 24)
7. lack of grounds to interfere with trial court's order (Para 26 , 27)
8. application rejected on merits (Para 28)

JUDGMENT

Subhash Vidyarthi, J.

Heard Sri S. P. Mishra, the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Kuldeep Srivastava, the learned counsel for the respondent - Directorate of Enforcement (E.D.) and perused the record.

2. By means of the instant application filed under Section 482 of the CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE , the applicant has challenged validity of the summoning / cognizance order dated 02.04.2018 passed by the Sessions Judge, Allahabad in Complaint No. 02/2018. The case has subsequently been transferred to the Court of Special Judge, C.B.I. - 6, Lucknow and the applicant has approached this Court when the trial Court has passed an order dated 19.04.2023 issuing non-bailable warrant against the applicant.

3. Briefly stated, facts of the case are that on 29.05.2000, the Regional Manager, Ballia Gramin Bank, Ballia had sent a complaint against one Chandra Prakash Singh, Branch Manager, Ballia, Gramin Bank and some unknown persons, stating that when Chandra Prakash Singh was posted as Branch Manager during the period December 2008 to December 2009, he had embezzled public money for his personal gain and had misappropriated an amount of 1.60 Crores (approximately) and had thereby caused financial loss to the bank. In furtherance of the aforesaid complaint, a First Information Report bearing number RC 0062010A0017 under Sections 120-B, 409, 420 I.P.C. read with Sections 13 (2) and 13 (1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 was filed on 11.06.2010 against Chandra Prakash Singh and other unknown persons. The matter was investigated by CBI/ACB and on 30.06.2011, a charge-sheet was forwarded alleging commission of offences under Sections 120 B, 409, 477-A of the Indian Panel Code read with Section 13 (2) and 13 (1) (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and substantive offence under Sections 409 and 477A IPC and Sections 13 (2) read with 13 (1) (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 against several persons, including the applicant, alleging that Chandra Prakash Singh had caused wrongful loss of 56,47,592/- to the bank in criminal conspiracy with the applicant and certain other persons. The charge-sheet was submitted on 04.07.2011

4. Subsequently on 06.01.2012 the E.D. registered ECIR No.0/VSI.2012, investigated the matter, recorded statements of several persons, including the applicant, and filed a complaint against five persons, including the applicant, on 16.09.2017 in the Court of Special Judge, PMLA, Allahabad, which has subsequently been transferred to Lucknow. Regarding the applicant, it is stated in the complaint that he had posted the manifold in respect of loan account Nos. 839, 841, 842 and 843, that these manifolds had been issued from Dataha and were used to close the loan account Nos. 839, 841, 842 and 843 on 04.12.2008. No account opening forms and no KYC documents were available in respect of the aforesaid loan accounts. The complaint states that the applicant knowingly assisted co-accused Chandra Prakash Singh in his wrongdoings and allowed him to use his ID and password for fraudulent transactions of banking funds and thereby committed offence under section 3 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as 'PMLA').

5. The trial court took cognizance of the case and summoned the accused persons by means of an order dated 02.04.2018.

6. There is absolutely no mention in the affidavit filed in support of the application regarding the conduct of the applicant after pass

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top