Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
BRIJ RAJ SINGH
Chandrama Devi Agrahari – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. The present application has been filed seeking quashing of the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 1914 of 2023, Ghanshyam Soni @ Pappu Vs. Lallu Prasad Soni an others, under Section 420 IPC, Police Station Amethi, District Amethi and the summoning order dated 08.022024 including the bailable warrant dated 03.08.2024 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Room No.20, Sultanpur.
2. Sri Prafulla Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that earlier the applicant consulted Sri J.N. Mishra, Advocate, for filing a criminal revision against the summoning order dated 08.02.2024, but on being advised to file an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. before this Court against the summoning order, the applicant orally instructed her counsel not to file the criminal revision before the Sessions Court, but despite the aforesaid instruction, Criminal Revision No.91 of 2024 was filed by the Advocate without informing the applicant, in which no interim order was passed. He has further submitted that on 20.09.2024, the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was filed before this Court challenging the orders dated 08.02.2024 and 0
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the non-mentioning of details with regard to previous petitions and the order disposing of the said petitions was not deliberate material conc....
A litigant must disclose all material facts when seeking relief from the court, and failure to do so can result in the denial of that relief. Successive applications under Section 482 Cr.P.C. on the ....
The court emphasized that successive FIRs regarding the same incident are impermissible and quashed the FIR based on concealment of previous complaints and forum shopping, affirming the requirement o....
Point of Law : Allegations made in complaint disclose commission of a cognizable offence and those allegations have found support in statements recorded under Sections 200 and 202 Cr.P.C. on the basi....
Suppression of material facts and failure to join necessary parties render a writ petition untenable; fraud on the court mandates dismissal of the case.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of approaching the court with clean hands and the consequences of suppression of material facts.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
