Back
MANISH KUMAR
Vijay Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Addl. Commissioner (Admn), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Hon'ble Manish Kumar, J.
1. Short counter affidavit has been filed by learned counsel for the respondent no. 4, which is taken on record.
2. Heard Shri Ravi Shanker Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Hemant Kumar Pandey, learned Standing Counsel and Shri Brijesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the private respondents.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that he does not want to file any rejoinder affidavit to the short counter affidavit filed by counsel for the respondent no.4.
4. With the consent of the parties the matter is being finally decided at this stage itself.
5. The present writ petition has been preferred for quashing of the impugned revisional order/judgment dated 09.04.2024 passed by respondent no. 1/Additional Commissioner (Admn), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya in revision no. 341/2024 (computerized no. C202404000000341 titled as Parikshit Kumar Singh vs. Vijay Kumar and Ors., under Section 210 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006.
6. Sri Hemant Kumar Pandey, learned Standing Counsel and Sri Brijesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 have raised a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of the present w
The judgment underscores the principle that admissions made by a party can serve as compelling evidence, and that procedural fairness requires that all objections and evidence be duly considered by t....
Mutation proceedings - There is no finding recorded either by Appellate Court or by Revisional Court as to who was in actual possession of property in question and therefore liable to pay revenue to ....
Mutation proceedings are summary in nature and do not decide substantive rights, thus a writ petition is not maintainable.
Complicated inheritance disputes regarding land rights should be resolved through regular civil suits, not summary mutation proceedings, as determined under applicable land laws.
Mutation orders require evidence of possession through lawful transfer, and failure to consider possession invalidates such orders.
Fraud vitiates all solemn acts; any order obtained through fraud is a nullity and can be questioned at any time.
Mutation is for fiscal purpose and does not confer any right and title in favor of anyone. Order passed in mutation proceedings shall not bar any suit in a competent court for relief on the basis of ....
: Mutation – When no limitation is prescribed for filing a revision petition, same must be filed within a reasonable time.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
