SIDDHARTHA VARMA, VINOD DIWAKAR
Rajesh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. When the deceased Ajay Kumar who was a student of B.A. in the D.A.V. College had gone missing then an application for missing/first information report was lodged on 8.1.1980 with allegations that the first informant had given Rajesh Kumar, a friend of his nephew Ajay Kumar, Rs. 700/-for getting diesel which was in short supply then, on 6.1.1980 at around 5:00PM and when till 7.1.980 till around 11:00AM, Rajesh Kumar did not come with the diesel then he sent his nephew Ajay Kumar to him who thereafter went missing. It had further been stated in the application/first information report that despite extensive search Ajay Kumar had not been found. He states that even Rajesh Kumar also was not to be found. The first informant/applicant, therefore, prayed that Ajay Kumar, his nephew, be searched out.
2. This application/F.I.R., with regard to Ajay Kumar going missing, was entered in the Police Report at GD-25. The chick as was prepared of the first information report lodged was exhibited as Exhibit – Ka-8 and was written by the Head Moharrir Jagdish Sharan for offences under Section 364 IPC. On. 8.1.1980 investigation of the case was entrusted to the PW-10 Rajendra Pal Jain,
Brij Bhushan Singh vs. Emperor
C. Muniappan and others vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Kirshnappa v. State of Karnataka
Mohmed Inayatullah v. State of Maharashtra
Ramanand @ Nandlal Bharti vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Sharad Birdichand Sarda vs. State of Maharashtra
Criminal Law – Appeal against conviction – Theory of last seen – Reliability of - The last seen theory comes into play where the time gap between point of time when Accused and deceased were seen las....
In criminal cases based on circumstantial evidence, the prosecution must establish a complete and conclusive chain of evidence that excludes all reasonable hypotheses of innocence; mere suspicion is ....
Conviction on circumstantial evidence requires such evidence to establish a complete chain pointing exclusively to guilt, without leaving doubt about the accused's innocence.
In cases based on circumstantial evidence, the prosecution must establish a complete chain of circumstances that excludes any reasonable hypothesis other than guilt, failing which the accused is enti....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.