J. J. MUNIR
Anil Kumar Srivastava – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
J.J. MUNIR, J.
1. The question involved in this petition is: Whether in case of a retired Group 'D' employee, any excess payment of emoluments made during the period of service, which he consents to refund out of his dues at a later point of time, if found erroneous, can be deducted from the employee's post retiral benefits? The other question is: Can recovery of emoluments paid by the employer due to an erroneous fixation be made on a mere objection by the Local Fund Audit, without opportunity of hearing to the employee and a proper order made to that effect?
2. The petitioner was a Chungi Munshi, a Group 'D' employee with the Nagar Palika Parishad, Basti. He attained the age of superannuation and retired from service on 30.04.2022. At the time of his retirement, the petitioner was in receipt of a basic pay of Rs.53,600/-. The petitioner says that he has never been subjected to any disciplinary action and his service record is unblemished. The Commissioner, Basti Division, Basti addressed a memo dated 21.07.2023 to the Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Basti, asking the latter, to pay the petitioner his gratuity in the sum of Rs.9,46,308/-. He also addressed another mem
High Court of Punjab & Haryana and others v. Jagdev Singh
Punjab and Haryana and others vs. Jagdev Singh
Punjab National Bank v. Manjeet Singh
Purshottam Lal Das v. State of Bihar
Shyam Babu Verma v. Union of India
State of Punjab and others v. Rafiq Masih (White Washer) and others
State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.