SHEKHAR B. SARAF
Tata Steel Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Trade Tax, Lucknow – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application No. 301923 of 2010
1. I have perused the affidavit accompanying the delay condonation application and find that sufficient cause has been made out for condoning the delay in filing the review application. Accordingly, the delay in filing the review application is condoned.
2. The delay condonation application is allowed.
Review Application
3. The instant review application preferred by the Commissioner Trade Tax, U.P., Lucknow (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Respondent’) arises out of an order dated February 15, 2010 passed by this Court in STRE No. 225 of 2002.
FACT
4. I have outlined the brief facts leading up to the instant review application below:
Aribam Tuleshwar Sharma v. Aribam Pishak Sharma
Arun Dev Upadhyaya v. Integrated Sales Service Limited
Commissioner of Trade Tax v. M/s Kajaria Cements Ltd. (2005) 11 SCC 149
Dokka Samuel v. Dr Jacob Lazarus Chelly
Haridas Das v. Usha Rani Banik
Hari Vishnu Kamath v. Syed Ahmad Ishaque
Meera Bhanja v. Nirmala Kumari Choudhury
Moran Mar Basselios Catholicos v. Mar Poulose Athanasius AIR 1954 SC 526
Northern India Caterers (India) Ltd. v. Governor of Delhi
Satyanarayan Laxminarayan Hegde v. Mallikarjun Bhavanappa Tirumale
Shanti Conductors (P) Ltd. v. Assam SEB
Shivdeo Singh v. State of Punjab
State of W.B. v. Kamal Sengupta
Thungabhadra Industries Ltd. v. Govt. of A.P. AIR 1964 SC 1372 : (1964) 5 SCR 174
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.