Shashi Kant Tiwari vs High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(All) 638

VIVEK KUMAR BIRLA, DONADI RAMESH
Shashi Kant Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sushil Kumar Shukla, Shashi Kant Shukla
For the Respondent: Ashish Mishra

Table of Content
1. the initial hearing outlines the structure of employment and intentions regarding examination. (Para 1)
2. factual background of the petitioner's case and attempts in examinations (Para 2 , 3)
3. arguments challenging the rejection based on employment circumstances (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
4. court’s analysis of the implications of full-time employment on advocacy eligibility (Para 8 , 10 , 11)
5. establishment of eligibility criteria from constitutional and statutory provisions (Para 12 , 13 , 16 , 18)
6. the court's conclusion reiterates the requirement of continuous practice for eligibility. (Para 19 , 20)
7. court’s final dismissal of the petition based on established criteria (Para 22 , 24 , 25)

JUDGMENT :

Vivek Kumar Birla, J.

1. Heard Sri Shashi Kant Shukla along with Sri Sushil Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ashish Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the respondents-High Court.

2. Present petition has been filed with the following prayers:-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2024 Supreme(All) 638

VIVEK KUMAR BIRLA, DONADI RAMESHShashi Kant Tiwari – AppellantVersusHigh Court Of Judicature At Allahabad – Respondent

Cases Referred (10)

VIVEK KUMAR BIRLA, DONADI RAMESH
Shashi Kant Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad – Respondent