KAUSHAL JAYENDRA THAKER, UMESH CHANDRA SHARMA
Aslam Noor Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Sri Jugal Kishor Khanna assisted by Sri Amit Khanna, learned counsel for the appellants in both these appeals and the learned AGA for the State in both these appeals.
2. These appeals challenge the judgment and order dated 19.2.2018 passed by Special Judge (SC/ST Act)/Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 2, Farrukhabad in Sessions Trial No. 91 of 2014 (State v. Aslam Noor Khan and another) convicting accused-appellants under Sections 452, 304/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as 'IPC') and sentenced them to undergo imprisonment for life with fine of Rs. 10,000/- under Section 304/34 of IPC and in default of fine further to undergo six months additional imprisonment each and they have been also convicted for three years rigorous imprisonment each under Section 452 IPC and fine of Rs. 5,000/- and in case of default of payment of fine, further to undergo three months additional imprisonment each.
3. Factual scenario as culled out from the record and the
G.V. Siddhramesh v. State of Karnataka
Hari Om v. State of Haryana and another
Ravi Pratap Singh v. State of U.P.
State of U.P. v. Madan Mohan and others
Pravat Chandra Mohanty v. State of Odisha
B.N. Kavatakar and another v. State of Karnataka
Veeran and others v. State of M.P.
Mohd. Giasuddin v. State of A.P.
Deo Narain Mandal v. State of U.P.
Ravada Sasikala v. State of A.P.
Guru Basavraj v. State of Karnatak
The distinction between culpable homicide and murder was clarified, emphasizing the need for proportionality in sentencing within the reformative justice framework.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the distinction between 'murder' and 'culpable homicide not amounting to murder' under the Indian Penal Code, and the emphasis on the reformative a....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the dying declaration, the determination of the nature of the offense, and the application of the appropriate section of the ....
The court established that the distinction between murder and culpable homicide hinges on the intent and premeditation of the accused.
Point of Law : Crime is a pathological aberration. The criminal can ordinarily be redeemed and the state has to rehabilitate rather than avenge. The sub-culture that leads to ante-social behaviour ha....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.