Chaudhary Pratap Singh vs State of U. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(All) 2054

RAJEEV MISRA
Chaudhary Pratap Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Amit Daga
For the Respondent: A.G.A. and Mehul Khare

JUDGMENT :

Rajeev Misra, J.

Criminal Misc. Correction Application No. 7 of 2023

Heard Mr. Amit DagA, the learned counsel for applicants and the learned A.G.A. for state.

2. This correction application has been filed seeking correction in the order dated 4.1.2023

3. Perused the correction application.

4. Upon perusal of correction application, this Court finds that there are numerious clerical mistakes in the order dated 4.1.2023.

4-A. For the facts and reasons noted above and as mentioned in the affidavit filed in support of correction application, the same is liable to be allowed.

5. In view of above, instead of making corrections in the order dated 4.1.2023, a corrected order is being passed. The same is being uploaded on the Website of the High Court Allahabad and the same be treated as the correct copy of the order dated 4.1.2023.

''Case : APPLICATION under Section 482 No. 1541 of 2022

Applicant : Chaudhary Pratap Singh and another

Opposite Party : State of U.P. and another

Counsel for Applicant : Amit Daga

Counsel for Opposite Party : G.A.,Mehul Khare

Hon'ble Rajeev Misra, J.-Heard Mr. Amit Daga, the learned counsel for applicants, the learned AGA for State and Mr. Vinay Saran the learned S