Chaudhary Pratap Singh vs State of U. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(All) 2813

RAJEEV MISRA
Chaudhary Pratap Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Applicants : Amit Daga
For the Opposite Parties : G.A., Mehul Khare

Table of Content
1. charge sheet and allegations outlined. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments regarding delay in fir lodging. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
3. opposition counters claims with investigation results. (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
4. confusion about the prior court order and its impact. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
5. ruling that prosecution is false and quashed. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31)

JUDGMENT

Rajeev Misra, J.

Heard Mr. Amit Daga, the learned counsel for applicants, the learned AGA for State and Mr. Vinay Saran the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Mehul Khare, the learned counsel for first informant/opposite party-2.

2. Perused the record.

3. Present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed challenging Charge Sheet No. 13 of 2020 dated 27.05.2020 submitted in Case Crime No.26 of 2020 under Sections 354B, 323, 504 and 506 I.P.C. P.S. Mahila Thana, District Moradabad, Cognizance Taking Order /Summoning Order dated 24.07.2020 passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division)/F.T.C. (CAW), Moradabad in consequential Criminal Case No. 10426 of 2020 ( State of U.P. v. Chaudhary Pratap Singh and others), under Sections 354B, 323, 504 and 506 I.P.C. P.S. Mahila Thana, District M