SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 1948

RAHUL CHATURVEDI
Krishna Agencies – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Applicant : Syed Mohammad Abbas Abdy
For the Respondent: A.G.A.

JUDGMENT :

Rahul Chaturvedi, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A.

2. By means of the present application, the prayer sought by the applicant is to quash the entire proceeding of Complaint case No. 32329 of 2020 under Section 420 IPC and Section 63 of Copyright Act, Police station-Harbans Mohal, District-Kanpur Nagar, pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Court No. 3, Kanpur Nagar as well as summoning order dated 22.11.2022 passed by learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Court No. 3, Kanpur Nagar.

3. Contention raised by learned counsel for the applicant challenging the order impugned on the two grounds :

    (i) Since, the contesting parties are residing at two different places and thus, in all fairness, the Magistrate ought to have adhere mandatory provision of Section 202(1) of Cr.P.C. ;

(ii) The order does not speak that the concerned Magistrate has applied his judicial mind while summoning the accused persons under Section 420 IPC and Section 63 of Copyright Act. In this regard, learned counsel for the applicant has drawn the attention of the Court to Section 202(1) Cr.P.C. which reads thus :

Section 202(1) in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top