SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1264

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, GAJENDRA KUMAR, JJ.
Razi Hasan and another – Appellants
Versus
State of U.P. and others - Respondents
Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 1280 of 2024
Decided on : 18-04-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Vikas Srivastava
For the Respondent: A.G.A.

The court emphasized that property cannot be attached under the U.P. Gangsters Act without reasonable belief based on evidence, reinforcing the necessity of following natural justice principles during administrative proceedings.

Headnote:(A) U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 - Section 14(1) - Challenge to attachment of property - Writ petition for quashing the attachment order stating it was built from legal sources. No adequate opportunity was provided to the petitioner for defending the claim regarding property ownership, violating principles of natural justice. Court held that 'satisfaction must not be arbitrary and must be based on legal conditions indicated in Section 14', determining that the burden lies on the state to establish that property was acquired illegally. (Paras 5, 9, 18-22)

(B) Natural Justice - The principles must be adhered to in administrative decisions with civil consequences, mandating reasonable opportunity to present a case and relevant evidence. (Para 10)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners challenged an order of attachment issued by the District Magistrate under Section 14 of the Act, claiming ownership of the property built with legal earnings and funds from the petitioner’s son. They alleged arbitrary action and violation of natural justice as no proper hearing was granted to contest the allegations.

Findings of Court:
Court found attachment order flawed due to lack of adequate reasons and compliance with statutory requirements and ruled for fresh consideration on procedural grounds.

Issues: Whether the District Magistrate's order was arbitrary and if the principles of natural justice were followed.

Ratio Decidendi: The decision underscored the importance of a reasoned basis for attachment orders and adherence to natural justice principles, with the court stating that the subjective satisfaction of authorities should be based on relevant material.

Result: Writ petition allowed; attachment order quashed and remitted for fresh determination.

Table of Content
1. writ petition details and relief sought. (Para 1 , 2)
2. factual background regarding the initiation of proceedings. (Para 3 , 4)
3. arguments of the petitioners contesting the legality of the attachment. (Para 5)
4. opposing arguments by the state regarding the legality of the attachment. (Para 6)
5. judicial review principles under article 226. (Para 7 , 8)
6. discussion on the principles of natural justice. (Para 9 , 11)
7. the requirement for specific reasons and adherence to natural justice principles in administrative actions. (Para 10)
8. interpretation of legal provisions under the gangster act. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
9. assessment of satisfaction requirements for property attachment. (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
10. conclusions drawn from the analysis leading to the quashing of the order. (Para 21 , 22)

JUDGMENT :

Hon'ble Gajendra Kumar, J.-Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AGA for the State-respondents.

2. Present writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India is preferred praying for following reliefs :

    ''(1) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned proceeding being held by the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in terms of provisions of Section 14(1) of U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 against the petitioner No. 1 and quash the impugned order dated 7.12.2023 passed by respondent No. 2 under Section 14(1) of U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, P.S. Hazarat Nagar Garhi, District Sambhal attaching the double story house of the petitioner No. 1 on the pretext that it has been built by the money collected in illegal way by the gangster Rehbar Hasan (petitioner No. 2).

    (2) To issue a writ order, or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to release the house of the petitioner No. 1, which is built on the plot No. 1618, area around 0.3480 hectare, which is situated at village Sirsi in favour of the petitioner No. 1

    (3) To issue any other or direction, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.''

3. Brief facts of the case are that on the basis of gang chart prepared and approved, First Information Report bearing Case Crime No. 142 of 2022, under Section 3(1) of U.P. Gangster and Anti Social (Activities) Act, 1986 (in short 'Act 1986') was filed by the S.H.O. Ramveer Singh, Police Station Hazrat Nagar, Garhi, District Sambhal with the allegation that Rehbar S/o Razi Hasan, R/o Mohalla Sharki Kasba Sirsi, P.S. Hazrat Nagar Garhi, District Sambhal is the gang leader of the gang and Rajeev S/o Badam Singh and Ballu @ Nawab Haidar S/o Fakare are the active members of the said gang. They are engaging in gambling activities for the temporal and pecuniary gains of the family, even they intimidate the people and extract money from them. There is a fear and terror prevalent among the people that is why no one dares to stand witness against them. They are continuously engaging in crime and it is not safe to keep them free. FIRs in case Crime No. 117 of 2022 under Section ¾ Public Gambling Act and Case Crime No. 121 of 2022, under Section 384/387/506 IPC are lodged with the local police, in which, charge-sheets have been filed respectively, charge-sheet No. 113 of 2022 dated 20.6.2022 and 116 of 2022 dated 22.6.2022 have been submitted to the Court and the cases are pending therein.

4. On the basis of police report filed by the S.H.O. Hazarat Nagar Garhi, District Sambhal dated 5.10.2023, proceeding under Section 14 (1) of U.P. Gangster and Anti Social (Activities) Act, 1986, was initiated and order of attachment was passed by the District Magistrate concerned on 3.3.2023. Against which, objection/representation dated 20.4.2023 was filed by the petitioner No. 1 with the averment that the attached property belongs to petitioner No. 1, he is owner and in possession of the same and it is his ancestral property and the house has been built there

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    Judicial Analysis

    AI

    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top