SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2076

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
H M S College of Pharmacy, Bulandsahar and Another - Petitioners
Versus
State of U.P. and Others - Respondents
Civil Misc. Writ Petition Nos. 8389, 8376, 8254, 8302, 8303, 8317, 8150, 7956 and 7978 of 2023
Decided On : 27-09-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Ajay Pratap Singh, Amit Kr. Singh Bhadauriya, Gopal Pandey, Prafulla Tiwari, Puttan Singh.
For the Respondents: C.S.C., D.K. Singh Chauhan, Ravi Singh.

Headnote:(A) Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 10, 12, 13, and 16 - U.P. Pravidhik Shiksha Adhiniyam, 1962 - Sections 12, 13, 14, and 23 - Approval process for educational institutions - The court examined the powers of the Pharmacy Council of India to grant approval for B. Pharma courses compared to the role of the State Board in granting affiliation. It found that the refusal of affiliation on grounds not communicated to institutions was illegal. The oversight by the State and Board in non-adherence to established guidelines was ruled arbitrary. An NOC procedure previously deemed unconstitutional could not impede the extension of affiliation once approval was granted by the PCI. The court upheld that the Pharmacy Act should take precedence in conflicts with State legislation. (Paras 4, 6, 8, 10, 34, 35)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners sought affiliation for their B. Pharma courses approved by the Pharmacy Council, but were denied due to undisclosed inspection deficiencies reported by the District Magistrate. The petitions challenged the legality of the Board's refusal without providing proper reason or opportunities to explain deficiencies.

Findings of Court:
The court quashed the Board's order refusing affiliation, stating that approvals from the PCI must lead to affiliation unless substantial grounds exist for revocation. (Paras 38)

Issues: The main issue was whether the approval from the Pharmacy Council necessitated affiliation from the State Board and whether the latter had acted arbitrarily in refusing it.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for fairness, stating that failure to inform and allow responses to deficiencies before adverse decisions is a violation of natural justice. The Pharmacy Council holds primary authority over pharmaceutical education standards under the Pharmacy Act, superseding State provisions. (Paras 24, 32, 34)

Result: The orders of the Board refusing affiliation are quashed.

JUDGMENT :

Pankaj Bhatia, J.

All the writ petitions, raising common question and as such, the same are being decided by means of a common order.

2. I have Heard Dr. L.P. Mishra, learned counsel assisted by Sri Amit Kumar Singh Bhadauriya, Prafulla Tiwari and Shri Ajay Pratap Singh, learned counsel for petitioners, Shri Nitin Mathur, learned Counsel for the State, Shri Ravi Singh learned counsel for P.C.I. Shri D.K.S. Chauhan, learned counsel for J.E.E.C. (P) and perused the material available on record.

3. For the sake of convenience, the facts as narrated in Writ-C No. 8389 of 2023 are being reproduced. The petitioners claim to be running a B. Pharma Course and were granted approval by the Pharmacy Council of India for the academic sessions 2022-23 and thereafter for the sessions 2023-24. The approval was granted with the petitioners in pursuance to powers vested in Pharmacy Council of India under the Pharmacy Act.

4. In some of the cases, for the academic sessions 2022-23 the approval was granted by the Pharmacy Council of India and affiliation was also granted by the Board of Technical Education, which is empowered to grant the affiliation. However, in some of the cases, the approval was granted by the Pharmacy of India, however, the affiliation as is required was not granted by the Board of Technical Education and in some cases 'NOC' was refused, which has led to the filing of the present writ petitions for the sessions 2023-24.

5. The contention of counsel for the petitioners is that in terms of the Pharmacy Act a council created under the said Act, known as the Pharmacy Council of India (PCI) is a statutory body, which is empowered to grant approval to the colleges in respect of B.Pharma and D. Pharma Courses. In terms of the mandate of Section 12 of the said Act, specific provisions exist for enabling an application by an authority, which proposes to conduct the course of study for Pharmacist to apply for approval and on an application being filed PCI, is empowered to grant the approval for running the courses. Section 13 of the said Act empowers the Council to withdraw the approval, on their existing relevant material to do so, in terms of the mandate of the Act. Section 16 of the Act provides for power of carrying out inspection in respect of the institutions which are seeking the approval. Section 18 of the said Act empowers the Central Council to make regulations with the approval of Central Government for regulating and carrying out the purpose to the Act. It is stated that in terms of the powers conferred by virtue of Section 10 of the said Act, the Central Government framed regulations known as Educational Regulations 2020, which came into force with effect from 9.10.2020. In terms of the regulations as framed (hereinafter referred to as 'the Regulations 2020), minimum qualifications required for the students undertaking the courses were prescribed. Regulation 8 confers the power of the Pharmacy Council of India to grant the approval to any authority, which is intending to start or conduct the diploma courses. The Pharmacy Council of India is also empowered to prescribe the regular academic study in terms of Regulations 8 (2) and specifically proviso thereto, places a restriction on Pharmacy Council of India to grant approval to any institutions unless all the parameters including the teaching, accommodation, equipment and teaching staff etc. are available with the institutions seeking the approval of the Pharmacy Council of India. Thus, in terms of the said Act, the PCI is empowered to grant approval and also places restrictions in granting the approval for want of the arrangements for teaching, equipment and teaching staff, etc. The Pharmacy Council of India is empowered to grant the approval for the institutions running B.Pharma and D.Pharma courses, however, the power to issue diploma vests with the Board of Te

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top