Back
YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Shrivatsa Goswami – Appellant
Versus
Anant Prasad Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, J.) :
A seminal question has arisen as regards the legal remedy available against an order passed in an appeal arising out of an order of rejection of plaint passed under Order VII Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (the Code).
2. It has been pointed out that there is considerable obfuscation on the issue with no clear enunciation of law on the point.
3. Heard Sri Tarun Agrawal, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri Rahul Sripat, learned Senior Counsel appearing alongwith Sri Ishir Sripat for the respondents. Sri Ajay Kumar Singh, learned counsel has also been heard.
4. The present appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 7.4.2023 passed by the Additional District Judge, Court No. 8, Mathura in Civil Appeal No. 67 of 2022 (Anant Prasad Singh v. Shrivatsa Goswami and another), whereby the appeal has been allowed and the earlier order dated 22.11.2022 passed by the trial Court rejecting the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code, has been set aside.
5. The facts giving rise to the aforesaid controversy emanates from an original suit being O.S. No. 83 of 2022 instituted by the plaintiff-respondent, seeking to declare
An order reversing a trial court's rejection of a plaint is a remand order, not a decree, thus subject to different appeal provisions.
The court established that an order reversing a trial court's rejection of a plaint is a remand order, not a decree, thus subject to different appeal provisions.
Revision petitions under Section 115 are non-maintainable against orders passed under Section 96; appeal should be under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
The principle of res judicata cannot serve as a basis for rejecting a plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC; it must be framed as a preliminary issue in trial.
Legal actions must be initiated within prescribed time limits, and stale claims that lack timely assertion cannot proceed; thus, suits filed beyond the limitation period are barred by law.
The court established that a plaint can be rejected under Order VII, Rule 11 if it is barred by limitation, regardless of the merits of the case.
Civil Law – Decree - A decree is preliminary when further proceedings have to be taken before suit can be completely disposed of. It is final when such adjudication completely disposes of suit - It m....
The proviso of Order 7, Rule 11 evidently covers the cases falling within the ambit of clauses (b) and (c) and has no application to a rejection of a plaint under Order 7 Rule 11(d).
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
