Back
J. J. MUNIR
A. P. Trivedi – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
J.J. Munir, J.
This writ petition is directed against the order dated 13.12.2013 passed by the Managing Director, Uttar Pradesh Rajkiya Nirman Nigam Limited, Lucknow (for short, 'the Corporation'), declining the petitioner's claim to be regularized on the post of an Office Assistant-I w.e.f. 27.3.1997, the date he was regularized in service as an Office Assistant-II. The petitioner also seeks a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Managing Director of the Corporation to regularize the petitioner on the post of Office Assistant-I w.e.f. 27.3.1997 and pay him the difference in emoluments as well as consequential benefits, within a period of time to be determined by this Court.
2. The petitioner's case, in substance, is that he was retained as an Office Assistant by the Corporation on muster roll. No appointment letter was issued, but his name was mentioned in the muster roll maintained by the Corporation. The petitioner describes his retention on the muster roll as an 'appointment' and says that he performed his duties to the best of his abilities with devotion and sincerity. During the entire period of his service, there was neither an adverse entry awarded nor any
Regularization for promotion posts requires prior service in the lower cadre, and claims of discrimination must be substantiated by participation in relevant judicial proceedings.
Regularization of service is the exclusive domain of the employer, and temporary and casual employees cannot seek regularization. Government orders come into effect from the date of issuance unless s....
The government servant is entitled to salary and other service benefits attached to the post only from the date of appointment and not prior to the said date of appointment.
The court ruled that administrative decisions regarding employment regularization must avoid arbitrary discrimination and adhere to principles of equal treatment under the law.
Reservation rules apply to regular appointments, entitling candidates to claim reserved positions despite prior engagement as temporary staff.
The court established that eligibility for regularization and pensionary benefits must be determined based on the criteria set forth in applicable regulations, and that such benefits cannot be claime....
The court established that employees cannot claim regularization unless they are working against sanctioned posts, as per the Jharkhand Regularization Rules of 2015 and 2019.
Employees who have served continuously and satisfactorily in essential government roles have a right to regularization, regardless of the temporary labels on their employment.
The court established that employees appointed under the same selection process are entitled to equal treatment and regularization, reinforcing the principle of non-discrimination under Article 14.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
