SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2142

SAROJ YADAV
Narendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
Jas Karan Lal Verma – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : R.N. Shukla.
For the Respondent: Sanjay Kumar.

Table of Content
1. dishonoured cheque details and related complaint. (Para 2 , 3)
2. court's reasoning on evidence and acquittal. (Para 4 , 8 , 9)
3. arguments regarding cheque issuance and defence. (Para 6 , 7)

JUDGMENT :

SAROJ YADAV, J.

1. This criminal appeal has been filed by the appellant against the judgment and order dated 26.05.1999 passed by Judicial Magistrate Ist, Barabanki in Complaint Case No. 662 of 1999 ( Narendra Singh vs. Jas Karan Lal Verma ) under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act 1881, Police Station Kotwali City, District Barabanki, whereby the accused/opposite party was acquitted.

2. The necessary facts for disposal of this appeal are as follows:

    A cheque was issued by the respondent in favour of the appellant and that was dishonoured. On 06.05.1998 the appellant sent a registered notice to the respondent within the prescribed time of 15 days. The notice so sent was received by the respondent on 14.05.1998 but the respondent did not pay the cheque amount to the appellant. Thereafter the appellant filed a criminal complaint against the respondent. In the complaint the appellant alleged that the respondent purchased Mentha Oil from the appellant and the payment

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top