SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1316

RENU AGARWAL
Kamal – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P Thru. Secy. Home, Lko. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Revisionist : Mr.Arjun Singh Somvanshi
For the Opposite Party : GA, Mr.Salma Bano, Mr.Shresth Agarwal

JUDGMENT :

Renu Agarwal, J.

Instant criminal revision under Section 19(4) of the Family Court Act has been preferred against the order dated 21.02.2023 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Court No.2, Unnao, in Case No.686 of 2016 (Smt.Sunaina Vs. Kamal), under section 125 Cr.P.C., whereby the application under section 125 Cr.P.C. moved by opposite party No.2 was partly allowed and revisionist was directed to pay Rs.2,000/- per month to opposite party Nos.2 from the date of application as maintenance.The arrears of maintenance are directed to be paid in five easy quarterly equal installments from the date of order.

2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the revisionist that marriage of revisionist with opposite party No.2 was solemnized on 07.05.2015 without any dowry. After marriage the opposite party No.2 lived in her matrimonial house with revisionist only for four days and gone to her parental home. The opposite party No.2 again returned to her matrimonial house and lived there only for ten days and went to her parental house and filed complaint against the revisionist in which revisionist was summoned under sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506, IPC and section 3/4 D.P. Act. In th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top