Back
ATTAU RAHMAN MASOODI, SUBHASH VIDYARTHI
Surya Prakash Mishra – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Subhash Vidyarthi, J.
(Order on C.M. Application No. I.A. 1 of 2024)
1. Heard Smt. Alka Verma, the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. This is an application for condonation of delay in filing the special appeal against the judgment and order dated 21.3.2024 passed by the Hon’ble Single Judge of this Court in Writ A No. 2377 of 2024.
3. In the affidavit filed in support of the application, it has been stated that the appellant is based at New Delhi and is suffering from chronic fever. It is also stated in the affidavit that after termination of his service, the appellant was facing financial crisis. The learned Standing Counsel has not seriously opposed the application for condonation of delay.
4. The application for condonation of delay is allowed and the delay in filing the Special Appeal is condoned.
(Order on Appeal)
5. The instant appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 21.03.2024 passed by the Hon’ble Single Judge in Writ A No. 2377 of 2024, which was filed challenging termination of the appellant’s service on the post of Teacher in D.A.V. Public School, Ambedkar Nagar, Uttar Pradesh, which is a private schoo
Employees of private educational institutions cannot invoke Article 226 for service disputes unless governed by statutory provisions, as established in St. Mary’s Education Society case.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution is not maintainable against a private unaided minority institution for service dis....
The Army Welfare Education Society is not a 'State' under Article 12, and the doctrine of legitimate expectation does not apply to private employment disputes.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the absence of a public law element in the termination of employment renders a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India no....
A writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not maintainable against a private unaided minority educational institution. A service dispute in the private realm involving a priva....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that an employment dispute between an employee and a private unaided school, arising out of a private contract, does not involve a public law eleme....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioner, as an employee of a school with a public element in imparting education, was entitled to avail the remedy under Article 226 of....
The judgment established that a writ petition for enforcement of a contract of service is not maintainable if the services are not controlled or regulated under any statute.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a service dispute involving a private educational institution and its employee is not amenable to challenge under Article 226 of the Constitut....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the authority's power to terminate services under Rule 15(ii) of the Anandalaya Education Society (Service conditions, discipline, conduct and appe....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
