Back
SIDDHARTH, SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI
Abdul Mannan – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J.
1. Heard Shri A.C. Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Anil Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for opposite party no. 4 and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.
2. Since pure legal issue is involved in this case therefore, without calling counter affidavit, with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the present Writ Petition is being decided finally at the stage of first hearing in view of the second proviso to Rule 2 of Chapter XXII of the Allahabad High Court Rules (Rules of Court, 1952).
3. By means of the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed for quashing the First Information Report dated 29.08.2024, registered as Case Crime No. 0293 of 2024, under Sections 419, 420, 323, 504, 506, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code at Police Station-Shahganj, District-Jaunpur and also for a direction to the official respondents not to arrest the petitioner in pursuance of impugned First Information Report.
4. The relevant facts of the case in brief as culled out from the averments made in the writ petition are that the present petitioners an
The FIR was quashed as it contravened Section 52A(3) of the Waqf Act, 1995, which bars cognizance of offences without a complaint from the Waqf Board.
Civil courts retain jurisdiction to determine eviction claims even if waqf status is asserted, unless unequivocally proven as such. Defendants cannot contest landlord's title without substantiating t....
Removal from Mutawalliship of Waqf estate – Disputed question of facts which cannot be gone into in a writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the provisions of Section 52-A and Section 68 of the Waqf Act, 1995, do not cover criminal misappropriation, cheating, or fabrication of recor....
The court established that penal provisions of the Waqf Act cannot apply retrospectively to actions occurring before their enactment.
The constitution of an inquiry commission by the State is valid despite challenges under the Waqf Act, 1995 when prior waqf declarations are arbitrary, devoid of proper procedure, and the property in....
Cheating - Quashing of FIR - Petitioner cannot claim benefits of Section 108A of Act, 1995 - offence committed under Section 61 of Act, 1995 and FIR lodged under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and ....
(1) Suit for permanent injunction in respect of Waqf property is maintainable before Waqf Tribunal.(2) Waqf Tribunal shall be deemed to be a Civil Court and shall have same powers as may be exercised....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
