IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
Jagdish Singh @ Jagdish Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. and Another – Respondents
Application U/s 482 No. 5413 of 2024, Application U/s 482 No. 2283 of 2023
Decided On : 04-10-2024
Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 323, 504, 506, 307, 332, 353, 188, 270 - Criminal proceedings arising from FIR No. 0271 of 2020 - The applicant was exonerated in departmental proceedings for identical charges, leading to the quashing of criminal proceedings as continuation would be futile. (Paras 36, 37)
(B) Standard of Proof - The court emphasized that the standard of proof in criminal cases is beyond reasonable doubt, which is higher than in departmental inquiries where it is based on preponderance of probabilities. (Paras 30, 36)
Facts of the case:
The applicant was charged with multiple offenses after allegedly violating lockdown guidelines and assaulting police personnel during a routine check. The FIR was lodged on 13.05.2020.
Findings of Court:
The court found that the applicant's exoneration in the departmental inquiry rendered the criminal proceedings unsustainable.
Issues: Whether criminal proceedings can continue after exoneration in departmental proceedings for identical charges.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that if identical charges could not be established in departmental proceedings, criminal prosecution on the same facts cannot continue.
Result: Applications allowed; criminal proceedings quashed.
JUDGMENT :
SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
1. Subject matter of both the applications filed by the applicant namely Jagdish Singh @ Jagdish Kumar Singh relates to Case Crime/FIR No. 0271 of 2020, under Section 323, 504, 506, 307, 332, 353, 188, 270 IPC, P.S. Kakori, District-Lucknow and as such the same are being decided by means of this common order/judgment.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Shri S.P. Tiwari, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
3. APPLICATION U/S 482 No. 5413 of 2024 has been filed seeking following main relief:
4. APPLICATION U/S 482 No. 2283 of 2023 has been filed seeking following main relief:
5. Brief facts of the case, which are relevant for adjudication of the matter, in brief are as under:
6. Considering the allegations levlled in the FIR, the same was lodged under Sections 323, 504, 506, 307, 332, 353, 188, 270 IPC against jagdish Singh S/o Ravindra Singh (applicant), Hardwari Prasad S/o Ishwardeen, Anil Kumar Gupta and one unknown person.
7. It would be apt to indicate that the applicant was released on bail in compliance of the order dated 01.06.2020 passed by the trial Court in Bail Application No. 1747 of 2020.
8. After completion of investigation, which includes reducing the statements of the witlessness of prosecution in writing, the charge-sheet no. 01 dated 14.07.2020 was filed against the applicant/Jagdish Singh S/o Ravindra Singh, Haridwari Singh S/o Iswardeen. under under Sections 323, 504, 506, 307, 332, 353, 188, 270 IPC. Subsequently, the charge-sheet no. 02 dated 01.11.2020 was filed against Anoop Kumar Gupta S/o Krishna pal under Sections 323, 504, 506, 307, 332, 353, 188, 270 IPC. Thereafter the charge-sheet no. 03 dated 16.02.2021 was filed. By this charge-sheet the investigation was closed a
Ashoo Surendranath Tewari v. CBI
J. Sekar Alias Sekar Reddy Vs. Directorate of Enforcement
Criminal proceedings cannot continue if the accused has been exonerated in departmental inquiries for identical charges, due to the higher standard of proof required in criminal cases.
Exoneration in departmental proceedings does not automatically quash criminal proceedings, which must be determined based on evidence in court.
Point of law : If allegations in the departmental inquiry could not be proved on merit and the person is held to be innocent, criminal prosecution on the said facts cannot be permitted to be continue....
If the exoneration in the departmental proceedings is on merits and the allegations are found to be not sustainable, the criminal prosecution on the same set of facts cannot be allowed to continue.
Exoneration in departmental proceedings on merits precludes subsequent criminal prosecution on identical allegations due to differing standards of proof.
Exoneration in a disciplinary proceeding does not automatically terminate criminal prosecution; both proceedings are governed by different evidentiary standards.
The court ruled that if a petitioner is exonerated in a departmental inquiry on merit, the same allegations cannot be prosecuted further in criminal proceedings due to the higher standard of proof re....
Exoneration in departmental proceedings on merits can lead to the quashing of criminal proceedings based on the same allegations, as the higher standard of proof in criminal law makes it unlikely tha....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.