IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. – Petitioner
Versus
Preeti @ Preeti Devi and Others – Respondents
Matters Under Article 227 No. 4182 of 2024
Decided On : 03-09-2024
(A) Constitution of India - Article 227 - Writ petition challenging the order of Permanent Lok Adalat directing payment of death compensation under Group Accident Insurance Policy - The petitioner rejected the claim based on unverifiable income certificate - The court found the rejection unjustified as verification should have been conducted properly - The conduct of the petitioner in filing frivolous litigation was condemned. (Paras 2, 10, 11)
(B) Insurance Claims - The insurer must verify claims adequately and cannot reject them based solely on verification methods that are not applicable to the documents submitted. (Paras 7, 9)
Facts of the case:
The petitioner rejected a death compensation claim based on an income certificate that could not be verified online, while the claimants argued that it was issued offline and valid.
Findings of Court:
The court found that the rejection of the claim was unjustified and condemned the insurer's conduct in filing frivolous litigation.
Issues: The main issue was whether the insurer's rejection of the claim based on verification methods was justified.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the insurer must conduct proper verification of claims and cannot reject them based on unverifiable methods alone.
Result: The petition was dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Sri Vineet Singh Chauhan, the leraned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Hemant Kumar Pandey, the learned Standing Counsel for the opposite parties no. 4 and 5, Sri Rinku Verma and Sri Ajeet Kumar, the learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 1 to 3 and perused the records.
2. By means of the instant writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the validity of judgment and order dated 10.05.2024, passed by Permanent Lok Adalat, Lucknow in Permanant Lok Adalat Case No. 428 of 2018, Smt. Preeti and others Vs. Oriental Insurance Company Limited, directing the petitioner to pay Rs.5,00,000/- to the opposite parties no. 1 to 3 as death compensation claim amount under Group Accident Insurance Policy, consequent to death of husband of opposite party no. 1, who died on 28.12.2016.
3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the petitioner-Oriental Insurance Company Limited has entered into a contract with the State of Uttar Pradesh under Mukhyamantri Kisan Evam Sarvhit Beema Yojna, which is a Group Accident Insurance Policy under which the petitioner is liable to pay claim amount in respect of injuries/death caused due to the accident of eligible persons.
4. The opposite parties no. 1, 2 and 3 filed a claim stating that the husband of the opposite party no. 1 and father of the opposite parties no. 2 and 3 died on 28.12.2016 in a road accident, while he was aged merely 30 years. The insurance claim was supported by an income certificate dated 21.09.2024 of the deceased issued by the Tehsildar, Kulpahar, Mahoba. On 10.03.2017 the petitioner rejected the insurance claim for the reason that the income certificate could not be verified in its online verification. The opposite parties submitted a fresh income certificate dated 20.03.2017 issued by the Tehsildar, Kulpahar, Mahoba. After rejection of the claim the opposite parties no. 1, 2 and 3 filed P.L.A. Case No. 428 of 2018 before the Permanent Lok Adalat which has been allowed by means of the impugned order.
5. While assailing the validity of the order passed by the Permanent Lok Adalat, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the income certificate dated 21.09.2014 that was initially submitted by the claimants along with their claim, could not be verified in online verification and the subsequent income certificate issued by the Tehsildar in the year 2017 cannot form the basis of a claim raised in the year 2014.
6. Replying to the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 1, 2 and 3 as well as the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State have submitted that the income certificate dated 21.09.2014 had not been issued through online method and, therefore, its validity could not be verified through online mode. It had been issued by the Tehsildar through offline mode and it ought to have been verified through offline mode only, but the petitioner-insurance company failed to do so and it wrongly repudiated the claim on the ground that the certificate issued through offline mode could not be verified through online mode.
7. For rejecting the claim, the petitioner ought to have made verification of the income certificate of the deceased submitted by the opposite parties in a proper manner. The claim could only be rejected after coming to a conclusion that the certificate was forged or fictitious. The mere fact that the income certificate issued through offline mode could not be verified by online mode, cannot be a ground for rejection of the insurance claim.
8. The learned Standing Counsel has submitted that the fresh income certificate dated 20.03.2017 bears a QR code thereon and therefore its validity can be verified through online mode and the learned Standing Counsel has himself verified its validity and has submitted a printout taken from the relevant government web portal which verifies genuine
Insurers must conduct proper verification of claims and cannot reject them based solely on unverifiable methods.
Point of Law : Plea of limitation taken up in the present case on the strength of clause 20 of the agreement read with Article 44 of the Schedule appended to the Limitation Act, would not defeat the ....
There is nothing wrong in deciding the matter based on evidence adduced in the earlier round of litigation
The rejection of claims based on non-transferable rights was not mala-fide, and the penalty under Clause 22(b) was quantified at Rs. 75,000.
In insurance contracts, the insured must disclose all material facts; failure to do so can lead to repudiation of claims under Section 45 of the Insurance Act, 1938.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.