Back
AJAY BHANOT
Subhadra Devi – Appellant
Versus
Jogendra Anand – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Ajay Bhanot, J.
I. Introduction:
This appeal arises out of an award made by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/District Judge, Sant Kabir Nagar, hereinafter referred to as the "learned tribunal" in Motor Accident Claim Petition No. 24 of 2012 (Smt. Subhadra Devi and another v. Jogendra Anand and others) dated 27.04.2015 by partly allowing the claim of the claimants.
II. Case of the claimants and respondents before the learned tribunal:
2. The claimants are the parents of the deceased Km. Sanju.
3. Briefly the case of the claimants before the learned tribunal was that Km. Sanju was a student of class 12th when she died of injuries sustained in an accident which occurred on 02.03.2012. The accident was caused by the rash and negligent driving of the driver of truck bearing registration No. HR 55 B 4795. The offending vehicle was insured by respondent no. 3 Vidhi Sriram General Insurance Company Ltd. The deceased was 16 years of age at the time of her death.
III. Compensation awarded by the learned tribunal:
4. The learned tribunal in the impugned judgement dated 02.03.2012 awarded compensation which is depicted in the tabulated form hereunder:
| S. No. | Heads | Amoun |
Point of Law : In absence of any governing principle available in statutory regime, it was only in form of an indication - If a statutory instrument has devised a formula which affords better or grea....
The court applied the Uttar Pradesh Motor Vehicles Rules, 1998 to determine the compensation, including income, future prospects, and conventional heads, and upheld the interest and manner of payment....
The quantum of compensation payable to the claimants in a motor accident claim petition is to be determined by considering various factors, including future prospects, personal expenses of the deceas....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of legal principles related to compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, specifically focusing on loss of dependency, future prosp....
Compensation in motor accident cases must objectively calculate projected income and future prospects, with reliance on the deceased's age for multiplier application, ensuring just compensation for l....
The court established that compensation must consider future income prospects, especially for students with high potential, and emphasized the need for realistic assessments of earning capacity while....
The appropriate income, future prospects, and multiplier for calculating compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act were determined based on legal principles established in previous cases.
Compensation assessments in fatal accident claims must account for actual dependency, future prospects, and appropriate multipliers, following statutory guidelines and relevant precedents.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
