SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2524

AJIT KUMAR
Niresh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Pramod Kumar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Anil Kumar Pandey.

JUDGMENT

Ajit Kumar, J.

Heard Sri Anil Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the record.

2. By means of this petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 9th September, 2022 passed by the trial court modifying its earlier interim injunction order dated 22nd February, 2021 and also the order passed in revision petition by the court below rejecting revision petition under its order dated 18th November, 2022.

3. The argument advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners is that once the temporary injunction order was granted in favour of the petitioners and only order that was passed by this Court in previous proceedings was to permit the contesting defendants respondents to move an application for modification of the order, the court ought not to have modified the order in terms in which it has been done.

4. The observations made in the operative portion of the order that family partition/ arrangements that had taken place at the time of predecessor-in-interest should be maintained and accordingly, the parties would be permitted to do agriculture activity upon the suit land, was bad for the fact that par

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top