SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2559

SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL
Priti Yadav @ Pinki – Appellant
Versus
Ashwani Gwal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant : Shri Prakash Dwivedi.

Table of Content
1. the court recognizes the consensus of the parties to dissolve their marriage after a prolonged separation. (Para 5 , 6 , 9 , 14)
2. the court emphasizes the need for a pragmatic application of procedural rules in family law. (Para 10 , 11)
3. the discretion to waive the cooling-off period is affirmed as part of judicial interpretation of statutory provisions. (Para 13)

JUDGMENT

In re: Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application No. 01 of 2023

Present appeal has been presented with a delay of 11 days. The same has been duly explained.

2. Cause shown is sufficient.

3. Delay is condone. Delay condonation application is allowed.

Order on Appeal

4. Heard Sri Prakash Dwivedi, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri Sheo Mani Yadav, learned counsel for the respondent.

5. The present appeal has been filed under section 19 of the FAMILY COURTS ACT , 1984, arising from order dated 31.5.2023 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Allahabad in Case No. 1074 of 2023 (Ashwani Gwal v. Priti). By that order the learned court below has entertained the joint petition filed by the parties under section 13-B HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955 (hereinafter referred to as "Act, 1955"). Howev

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top