Babloo @ Ranjeet Singh vs State of U. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(All) 2543

ARVIND KUMAR MISHRA I, SARAL SRIVASTAVA
Babloo @ Ranjeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant : Apul Misra, P.N. Misra, Raghuvansh Misra.
For the Respondent:Govt. Advocate, I.K.Uppadhyay.

Table of Content
1. facts of the incident and prosecution's case. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
2. defence argument questioning witness reliability. (Para 11 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
3. court analysis on evidence and witness credibility. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33)
4. legal evaluation of intent and culpability. (Para 35 , 36)
5. final decision and dismissal of the appeal. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41)

JUDGMENT

Arvind Kumar Mishra-I, J.

Heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material brought on record.

2. The instant appeal has been preferred against the judgement and order of conviction dated 01.05.2010 passed by the Special/Additional Sessions Judge, Ballia in Session Trial No.187 of 2008, arising out of Case Crime No.93 of 2008, under Section - 302 I.P.C., Police Station - Nagra, District - Ballia, whereby the appellant has been convicted and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life under Section - 302 I.P.C., coupled with fine Rs.3,000/- in default of payment of fine, two years additional rigorous imprisonment.

3. Factual matrix of this case as discernible from record, proce