SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2496

CHANDRA KUMAR RAI
Somwati – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Rajeev Kumar, Prashant Yadav
For the Respondent: C.S.C, Krishna Kant Singh

JUDGMENT

Chandra Kumar Rai, J.

Heard Mr. Rajeev Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Abhisekh Shukla learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondent and Shri Krishna Kant Singh, learned counsel for the respondent- Goan Shabha.

2. Brief facts of the case are that one Prasadi, who belongs to scheduled caste community, was the bhumidhar of plot no.944/13, area 0.405 hectare, situated at village Vasundhara, Pargana Marhara, Thesil and District Etah. Petitioner is the daughter of Prasadi. Prasadi had executed a registered will deed on 21.1.2000 in respect to his share of the plot in dispute in favour of respondent no.6-Neeresh Kumar, whose name was also mutated in the revenue records on the basis of aformentioned will deed vide order dated 30.8.2010. A restoration application was filed by Veeresh on 17.5.2016 along with delay condonation against the order dated 30.8.2010 in respect to the aforementioned will deed dated 21.1.2000 with the allegation that execution of the will deed by Prasadi in favour of Neeresh Kumar, who belong to Other Backward Caste Community, is in violation of the provisions contained under the U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act/U.P. Revenue Code, 20

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top