SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2496

CHANDRA KUMAR RAI
Somwati – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Rajeev Kumar, Prashant Yadav
For the Respondent: C.S.C, Krishna Kant Singh

Table of Content
1. petitioner's inheritance claim based on will deed. (Para 2)
2. arguments on legality of will deed and its cancellation. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court affirms execution violation and legality of vesting. (Para 5 , 6 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. significance of statutory provisions on land transfer restrictions. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
5. final dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 13 , 14)

JUDGMENT

Chandra Kumar Rai, J.

Heard Mr. Rajeev Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Abhisekh Shukla learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondent and Shri Krishna Kant Singh, learned counsel for the respondent- Goan Shabha.

2. Brief facts of the case are that one Prasadi, who belongs to scheduled caste community, was the bhumidhar of plot no.944/13, area 0.405 hectare, situated at village Vasundhara, Pargana Marhara, Thesil and District Etah. Petitioner is the daughter of Prasadi. Prasadi had executed a registered will deed on 21.1.2000 in respect to his share of the plot in dispute in favour of respondent no.6-Neeresh Kumar, whose name was also mutated in the revenue records on the basis of aformentioned will deed vide order dated 30.8.2010. A restoration application was filed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top